Advanced Search
Liberace Show #84, Master 706
Selections: "Under Paris Skies" "Echo Serenade" FEATURING CELLOIST BOLININI "April In Paris" with vocal "Can-Can" (Offenbach) with dancers "Clair de Lune" (Debussy) "French National Anthem"
Liberace Show #85, Master 707
Selections: "Five Note Song" "Minuet" (Boccherini) "Gay 90's Medley" Barbershop Quartet "Only A Bird In A Guilded Cage" "Roaring 20's Medley" The Charleston (1st sequin coat used) "Rhapsody in Blue" "Sun In The Morning, Moon In The Night"
Liberace Show #86, Master 708
Selections: "Tisket, Tasket" with vocal "Deep Purple" "Greensleeves" with vocal "Cherry Pink and Apple Blossom" FEATURING BILL REGIS ON TRUMPET "Blue Danube" "Black Magic"
Liberace Show #87, Master 709
Selections: "A Pretty Girl Is Like A Melody" with vocal INTRODUCES THE WOMEN OF THE LIBERACE FAMILY "Ruby" FEATURING A HARMONICA PLAYER "Anna" with vocal "Vanessa" FEATURING HARMONICA PLAYER "Laura" "Nola" FEATURING BALLET DANCER
Comedy/Humour (Reel 2 of 2)
517-5 Humans and animals - monkey, lions, bear (includes a monkey dressed in a tuxedo eating dinner at a restaurant and smoking a cigar) (80') 517-19 Wrestling in Molasses (30') 517-2 Levitation (20') 517-17 Gangster Misc. (30') 517-14 Prohibition (100') 517-9 Bank Robbery (10') 517-13 Goat Sacrifice (50') 517-16 Roaring 20s scenes (450') (includes turn of the century recreations)
Liberace Show #83, Master 705
Selections: "Davy Crockett" with vocal (LIBERACE WEARS A COONSKIN CAP) Gershwin Medley: "Embraceable You" "Swanee River" "The Man I Love" "Sincerely Yours" with vocal "South American Way" "Concerto in B Flat Minor" (Tchaikovsky) "Tea For Two" with vocal and dance
Liberace Show #88, Master 711
Selections: "Gotta Get Goin" with vocal "Serenade" "The Last Roundup" with vocal "Lady of Spain" Theme from "High and Mighty" FEATURING MUZY MARSOLINO WHO WHISTLED THE THEM FOR THE MOVIE SND'TRK "Route 66" with vocal
Liberace Show #89, Master 712
Selections: "Spaghetti Rag" PHOTOS OF LIBERACE'S POOL AND BACKYARD "Rhapsody By Candlelight" "Cocktails For Two" with vocal "Cuba Liberace" with a dancing George Liberace "Serenade" (Schubert) "There'll Be Some Changes Made" with vocal FEATURES LIBERACE WEARING SOME OF HIS MANY OUTFITS
Liberace Show #90, Master 713
Selections: "Yakety Yak Polka" (Strauss) "5th Symphony-- An Dante Contobole" (Tchaikovsky) "Drinking Song-- La Traviata" (Verdi) FEATURES VOCALS BY LUCILLE NORMAN "Habanera" from "Carmen" "Carmen Boogie" "Ballet of the Clouds" with ballet dancers "Cement Mixer" (comedy song) FEATURES LUCILLE NORMAN
Liberace Show #91, Master 802
Selections: Unknown Title "Moonlight Sonata" (Beethoven) "I'll Be Seeing You" (closing theme) with vocal "Stars and Stripes Forever" (featuring George Liberace and the orchestra, as well as Liberace tap dancing in naval officer uniform) LIBERACE READS FROM THE WRITINGS OF TCHAIKOVSKY "No Business Like Show Business" with vocal
Liberace Show #92, Master 710
Selections: "Humoresque" "Broadway Medley" with dancers "Faith Unlocks the Door" with vocal "Lover" "Punchinello" (Rachmaninoff) "I'm Looking Over a Four Leaf Clover"
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 27, 1974
[00.15.19] Mr. RANGEL. Mr. Chairman? The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Rangel. Mr. RANGEL. I want to join in the praise given to the distinguished gentleman from New Jersey for withdrawing his motions to strike in the interests of saving time, -and then ask the distinguished gentleman from Alabama if indeed it is his purpose to bring facts before this committee as relates to specifies of Presidential wrongdoing, and certainly not to strike but to serve as an educational function and recognizing that a motion to strike may serve as that parliamentarian vehicle. I was wondering whether the distinguished gentleman from Alabama would accept either staff or members reciting specific dates and Times that support that particular article. I Think if the question really is one to educate the general public, then perhaps we could recite that information , but certainly whether any of the members of this committee agree on the standard of evidence that we will be using, there is no question that we do know what evidence we are using at this time. We may differ on the quality and the quantity that we think is necessary to support an article of impeachment, but I ask the, distinguished gentleman from Alabama that if indeed he wants to educate the general public and have specifies, would he not consent to those specifies being either by staff or members to support the article, so we can move on and finally get an opportunity to vote on this historic question. Mr. FLOWERS. Is this directed to me, Mr. Rangel? Mr. RANGEL. Yes. I yield to the gentleman from Alabama. Mr. FLOWERS,. I think that the only way in which we can elicit this information is through this vehicle or motion as it, Pertains to each one of the subparagraphs which tend to support the general statement in paragraph 2. My purpose is to elicit the information and to find out' what evidence there is. and I would hope that the staff and members of the committee would be able to respond expeditiously, as my friend from Illinois says, and we, will not, take a great amount of time, but I do not think that we should sacrifice thoroughness for expedition here. Mr. RANGEL. No. My question is, Mr. Flowers, if we were to read paragraph 2 and' if In fact staff or a member of this committee would give, you information and specifics as to what the President did or did not do to support that paragraph would you accept that and be prepared to allow the committee to vote as to whether or not this is sufficient evidence to support that paragraph? Mr. FLOWERS. I will say to the gentleman from New York that the only way a member can win the floor is to offer an amendment at this point, and there is no other parliamentary device for a member to, gain the floor, having already used up the 5 minutes which we were allocated in general debate on this article and, for that, purpose, I do not see that the parliamentary situation would allow that. Mr. RANGEL. If you stick to the -word "debate," there is no question that we have to deal with the motion to strike, but I am certain that the Chair would allow us as Mr. Sarbanes goes down the paragraphs, to give that specific information which we have used to support it and then, if that was done, there would be no need for 38 members to debate it. It would be a question as to whether we agreed with it and we could vote on it. I yield back the balance of my time. Mr. McCLORY. Mr. Chairman, parliamentary inquiry, The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman will state it, Mr. McCLORY. Mr. Chairman, I have, as you know, a proposed article and proposed article III, and I just want to be sure that I understand what our procedure will be for today. I understand that you will entertain perfecting amendments which will be discussed and that then you propose that with respect to motions to strike, articles, for purposes of--- The CHAIRMAN. Debates. Mr. McCLORY [continuing]. Debates, and for getting additional information such as the gentleman from Alabama suggests, that you will entertain a motion to close debate, a motion on the previous question at the end of 1 hour's time with regard to each one, of the paragraphs. Is that correct ? The CHAIRMAN. Or if a member would move the previous question earlier. Mr. McCLORY. But not to exceed 1 hour of discussion with regard to information on with respect to each of the subparagraphs. The CHAIRMAN. That is correct. Mr. McCLORY. Thank You, Mr. Chairman. Mr. LATTA. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have an inquiry. Let me say I concur in Mr. Sandman's statement. We are certainly not bowing just because we want to be bowing. We are bowing to the obvious and the obvious is that we do not have the votes. We are not deserting our position. We think it was a proper position. Yesterday those who believed as deeply as we did were not resorting to dilatory tactics, as has been reported in some places, but we definitely felt that the President of the United States should be able to answer the, charges that were being made against him, and they were not specific. They are still general, and that is the way they are going to be, they are going- to remain. But I vould like to at this juncture, Mr. Chairman, point out That there, has been some misinformation going Out across the country that, had we been successful and made these articles specific, that they could not have been amended on the floor of the House. I know the Chair knows and every member of this committee knows that we are not going to grant in the Rules Committee a closed rule on this matter. It will be, an open rule and subject to amendment on the floor. So if there are any additional charges that -wish to be brought or times or places under any of the articles that have been mentioned here that wish to be included, it could have been included by amendment on the floor of the house. I would just like to make the record straight that here is one member and I am sure that there are going to be 14 other members on the Rules Committee when this matter comes up there, going to be voting an open rule. [00.21.59]
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 27, 1974
[00.27.40] Mr. SARBANES, Will the gentleman yield? Mr. HOGAN. I yield to the gentleman from Maryland. Mr. SARBANES. Mr. Chairman, I would like to say that I think, as my colleague from Maryland has stated, that, these are helpful and valuable perfecting amendments. I appreciate the legal scholarship that has gone into these amendments 1 de think they help to improve the, proposition that is before us, and I would hope that the members would recognize and accept these amendments to the substitute. Mr. HOGAN. Chairman , 1 move the previous question on my amendments. The CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendments offered by the from Maryland, and I understand that these are being offered All those in favor of the amendments, Please say aye [Chorus of "ayes]. The CHAIRMAN. All those opposed? [No response.] The CHAIRMAN. And the amendment is agreed to. I recognize the gentleman from California, Mr. Danielson. Mr. DANIELSON. Mr. Chairman, 1 have an amendment at the desk. The CHAIRMAN. The clerk will read the amendment. The CLERK. [reading] Amendment to article I offered by Mr. Danielson. On page 2, subsection 4 strike the word "and" in line 3 and strike the semicolon after the words "Special Prosecution Force" in line 4 and add at the end of line 4 the following : and congressional committees; Mr. DANIELSON. Mr. Chairman, the thrust of subparagraph 4. as is apparent, relates to the interference by the President, or endeavoring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice the FBI the Office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force. I should like to add to those agents Congressional committees, have in mind specifically the House Committee on Banking and Currency under the chairmanship of Hon. Wright Patman. You will recall, a couple of days ago, during the early stages of our debate, I quoted at some length from the September 15, 1972, tape transcript of the conversation in the President's Oval Office in which was apparent that the President, his Chief of Staff, Mr. Haldeman, and Mr. Dean were planning on how they could possibly prevent the House Committee on Banking and Currency from conducting investigating into the whereabouts, the source, the transmission of certain that -were found in the possession of the people arrested in the Watergate on. June 17. The plan was rather elaborate. The President first offered todo so himself, and then he suggested that Mr. Ehrlichman or Mr. Mitchell or some other person contact and enlist the aid of Gerald Ford, who at that time was the minority floor leader and various other Members of the House of Representatives, to prevail upon Mr. Patman to to desist from conducting his investigation. In all fairness, I want to point out that Mr. Dean's testimony later was that the Members of the House who were being prevailed upon to in turn prevail upon Mr. Patman were not aware of the fact that they were being used for this purpose. The guise of the argument wa's that what if the trial forthcoming of' the burglars and maybe. I shold say the unlawful entrants, that a congressional hearing into their activities, might prejudice their case, and might interfere with their civil rights. This was explored at some length. I do not wish to reiterate it here because you have all heard it. In addition, they had a plan whereby they were to contact Mr. Rothblatt, who was the attorney for four or five of the defendants, and Mr. Bittman, who was the attorney for or Mr. Hunt, and have them in turn call upon Mr. Patman and urge that he not. conduct the investigation because it might interfere with their clients' civil rights, Other testimony before this committee is that Mr. Bittman acknowledges that he was contacted and was requested to get in touch with Mr. Patman, but that he declined to do so. Records of the, House Committee on Banking and Currency reflect that there was a, letter from Mr. Rothblatt, making the same argument. Carrying on, 1 have also in mind the Senate Select Committee on Campaign Activities. I might add going back, that the Banking and Currency Committee was not able, due, to these efforts, to muster enough votes to pass a, resolution to conduct the investigation, and the investigation was postponed. The fear in the minds of the. President, Mr. Haldeman, and Mr. Dean while they talked in the Oval Office was that if Wright Patman was able to issue subpenas and call in the -witnesses, he. might uncover almost anything. It was a can of worms and they didn't know what"" might happen if Patman were given a chance to conduct the investigation he wanted. Their fear was the disclosure of the fact that the $3,200 in new consecutive numbered bills found at the Watergate did in fact come through a Florida bank account, could be traced back to a Minnesota donor that had been laundered in some kind of a operation down Mexico. [00.33.38]
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 27, 1974
[00.39.47] Mr. McCLORY. Now, I do not agree with the interpretation of executive privilege as suggested by the gentleman from California, Mr. Wiggins, that the doctrine of executive privilege must yield when the President is being investigated. Otherwise the President is position where he can dictate what he wants to provide this committee with and what he does not want, to provide the committee with. I seems to me that in order for us to carry out a valid and full and fair investigation we, need all of the information which we have required and which we deem necessary. And our position has been strengthened by the recent opinion of the Supreme Court which has knocked down this doctrine, that so-called doctrine of the absolute executive privilege and in offering a, motion yesterday that we defer our proceedings for the purpose of giving the President an opportunity to provide the additional tapes that we have requested, it, seems to me that an opportunity again was offered for him to provide the kind of cooperation which it seems to me he should have been providing throughout these proceedings. And so I think it is perfectly valid for us to put in this article the inclusion of the words "and congressional committees" because in addition to his interference and in misuse perhaps of other agencies of Government, his defiance of this committee is, in my opinion, a, most serious matter and is entitled to be presented to the House of Representatives together with this proposed article as a later article which I propose to introduce. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. RAILSBACK. Mr. Chairman? The CHAIRMAN. I recognize the gentleman from Illinois, Mr. Railsback./ Mr. RAILSBACK. Mr. Chairman, I am opposed to the, article by the gentleman, Mr. Danielson, from California. Anybody that had any knowledge I believe of the possible motivations at that particular time of the Patman committee, who was on the receiving end of a possible investigation to be conducted by Wright Patman, probably would have had good reason to try to avoid what they believe very easily could have been a political fishing expedition and I think it very significant that the members of his own committee decided not to go along with the chairman in conducting that kind of an investigation which I think many of them believed was going to be a political fishing expedition. In respect to executive privilege, I agree with the comments made by the gentleman from California, Mr. Wiggins, and as far as refusing to comply with our subpenas, it is my own belief that that failure should not constitute an independent or separate article or item of an article of impeachment. I think. the President probably had a right to assert executive privilege even though I am convinced that if in it had been taken to court, the court would have ruled against the President. I think--I think, 'Mr. Chairman, what we are doing here is we are adding something that cannot be proved and that would certainly weaken article 1. Mr. FISH. Will the, gentleman yield? Mr. RAILSBACK. Yes, I will, I will be glad to yield, Mr. FISH,. I thank the gentleman for yielding and I would just like to associate myself with his remarks. I think in considering the language in an article of impeachment we must always bear in mind that it must rise to the gravity of a crime against the constitutional system and I agree with you that this proposed additional language simply does not meet that test. The CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California. All those in favor of the amendment, Please signify by saying aye. [Chorus of "ayes,"] The CHAIRMAN. All those opposed. [Chorus of "noes."] Mr. RAILSBACK. Can we have a record vote? Mr. Chairman, can we have a record vote, please? The CHAIRMAN. A record vote is demanded and the clerk will call the roll. All those in favor of the amendment, please signify by saying aye. All those opposed no, and the clerk- will call the roll. The CLERK. Mr. Donohue Mr. DONOHUE. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Brooks. Mr. BROOKS. Ave. The CLERK. Mr. Kastenmeier. Mr. KASTENMEIER. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Edwards. Mr. EDWARDS. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Hungate. Mr. HUNGATE. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Conyers. Mr. CONYERS. Aye. The CLERK. Mr Eilberg Mr. EILBERG. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Waldie Mr. WALDIE. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Flowers. Mr. FLOWERS. No. The CLERK. Mr. Mann. Mr. MANN. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Sarbanes. Mr. SARBANES. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Seiberling. Mr. SEIBERLING. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Danielson. Mr. DANIELSON. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Drinan. Mr. DRINAN. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Rangel. Mr. RANGEL. Aye. The CLERK. MS. Jordan. MS. JORDAN. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Thornton. Mr. THORNTON. Aye. The CLERK. Ms. Holtzman. MS. HOLTZMAN. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Owens. Mr. OWENS. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Mezvinsky. [-No response.] The CLERK. Mr. Hutchinson. Mr. HUTCHINSON. NO. The CLERK. Mr. McClory. Mr. McCLORY. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Smith. Mr. SMITH. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Sandman. Mr. SANDMAN. No. The CLERK. Mr. Railsback. Mr. RAILSBACK. NO. The CLERK. Mr. Wiggins. Mr. WIGGINS. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Dennis. Mr. DENNIS. Aye. The CLERK. Mr. Fish. Mr. FISH No. The CLERK. Mr. Mayne. Mr. MAYNE, NO. The CLERK. Mr. Hogan. Mr. HOGAN. NO. The CLERK. Mr. Butler. Mr. BUTLER. No. The CLERK. Mr. Cohen. Mr. COHEN. No. The CLERK. Mr. Lott. Mr. LOTT. No. The CLERK. Mr. Froehlich. Mr. FROEHLICH. No. The CLERK. Mr. Moorhead, Mr. MOORHEAD. No. The CLERK. Mr. Maraziti Mr. MARAZITI. NO. The CLERK. Mr. Latta. Mr. LATTA. No. The CLERK. Mr. Rodino. The CHAIRMAN. Aye. Mr. MEZVINSKY. Mr. Chairman? The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Mezvinsky. Mr. MEZVINSKY/ I would like to register my vote as aye. The CHAIRMAN. Mr. MezvInsky is voting aye. Mr. MEZVINSKY. Aye. [00.46.41]
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 27, 1974 (1/2)
[00.02.00] Mr. WIGGINS. ----that the President personally acted to corrupt the due administration of justice by intentionally engaging in a plan or design, a course of conduct or a plan which was intentionally designed to obstruct justice. Now. is that a fair statement? Mr. RAILSBACK. What I Intend by the amendment is to suggest that Richard M. Nixon, if it can be shown in the Senate, and if he can be held to account in the Senate, that he used his power of his high office, engaged personally and through his subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede, and obstruct the investigation of such unlawful entry to cover up, conceal and protect those responsible and to conceal the existence and scope of other unlawful and covert activities. In other words, the words speak for themselves. Mr. WIGGINS. I understand. You mean what you said. Well, I am running out of time. I want to clear up the question, however, of the conduct of his aides. In order to have this be, President's acts, you would require, I am sure, that at least the knowledge of the acts of his aides, or that, he instructed them with the requisite corrupt intent to obstruct justice, would you not? Mr. DENNIS. Mr. Chairman? Excuse me. Mr. RAILSBACK. I would answer the gentleman by saying that the language still speaks for itself. But, it is my belief that to hold Richard Nixon to account and to remove him from office it must proven that he has committed a serious offense, serious enough for which he should be removed from office. Now, if he directed something, or if he participated in something or if he Was involved in something that was clearly illicit, if he falsely misled the American people, or if 'he obstructed justice or impeded justice. or interfered with the due administration of justice, or if he abused the power of the sensitive, agencies of the IRS, well then I think that is what he is going to be held to account for. Mr. WIGGINS. All right. Fine. I appreciate the gentleman's explanation and I support the gentleman's amendment as I explained. The CHAIRMAN. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. DENNIS. Mr. Chairman? Mr. Chairman? I think I have, a little time, left. The CHAIRMAN. The Chair -will state pursuant to the policy that was set, no member could reserve any time. but if the gentleman is seeking more time" he can request unanimous consent, since he has already been recognized once on the amendment. Mr. DENNIS. I appreciate that, and if I could have it, I would like I to ask, the gentleman from Maryland, Mr. Sarbanes, a question. The CHAIRMAN. Well. without objection. Mr. DENNIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would like to ask the, gentleman this: Do you subscribe to Mr. Railsback's explanation of the meaning of his amendment, responsibility of the President for third person's actions, or do 3 feel that his amendment will support your own theory on that subject as announced by you Mr. SARBANES. Well, as I understood the last response, The gentleman from Illinois Mr. Railsback, gave, I thought that was proper elaboration of his amendment. As I understood it, part of what we have been discussing is this whole concept of the Madison superintendency theory, and I think this is very clear with respect to the proposition, and that proposition is not contained in this article as a potential premise. Mr. DENNIS. If I understand your- answer, then you feel that -Mr. Railsback's version comports very well with your own, as advanced before the amendment. Mr. SARBANES. Well, I must Confess to the gentleman from Indiana that I did not pay the, close attention to the full colloquy between -Mr. Railsback and Mr. Wiggins that I should have in order to respond definitively to the question that he has just put to me, and I apologize for that. But, it is my impression that the last response which I heard Mr. Railsback give seemed -to me a satisfactory elaboration of this amendment. Mr. DENNIS. Well, I am not sure Whether the gentleman are together or not. but if you are together with the gentleman from Illinois if he is together with you, why, since I did not like your version well before I am not persuaded that his is much different or very much better. The CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered BY the gentleman from IllinoIs. All those in favor of the amendment, signify by saying ave. [Chorus of "ayes. The CHAIRMAN. All those opposed? [Chorus of "noes." The CHAIRMAN. The ayes appear to have it and the amendment is agreed to. the CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Illinois? Mr. RAILSBACK. Mr. Chairman. I have a conforming amendment if I can find it. Can it be read? The CHAIRMAN. The clerk will read the amendment The CLERK. [reading] On page 1, line IS on the Sarbanes substitute beginning at the third paragraph, strike out the following: "The means used to implement this policy have included one or more of the following:" and insert in lieu thereof the following new language- "The means used to implement this course of conduct or plan included one or more of the following:" Mr. RAILSBACK. Mr. Chairman?, The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman is recognized for- 5 minutes. Mr. RAILSBACK. Mr. Chairman, I think the language speaks for itself and I am not going to belabor it. The CHAIRMAN--- The. question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman. All those in favor please say aye. [Chorus of "ayes."] The CHAIRMAN. All those opposed? [Chorus of "hoes."] The CHAIRMAN-. The ayes have it, and the amendment is agreed to. [00.08.32]
IBM Punch Card Reader Machine
IBM Punch Card Reader Machine CU IBM punch card reader in action, female hand pushes buttons setting the punched cards in motion, data is recorded onto punched ribbon which is wound onto reel.
1956 - IBM Computers - Printer
IBM Computers - Office, Employee, Man Reads Printout, Machine, Printer. Man walks up to computer, printer, machine; reads printout; US map in BG.
Misc. office machines
Misc. office machines
IBM Mainframe Computer Wiring
IBM Mainframe Computer Wiring MSs mainframe computer with the panels open showing the network of organized chaos inside. MSs computer board with wiring.
Making Office Equipment
Making Office Equipment CU male hands with gold wedding band using pressure gauge to calibrate typesetting machine.
1956 - IBM Film - Production Slate
IBM Film - Production Slate, Man, Women, Computer Punch Cards, Tabulating. Man holding film production slate; women at table, BG, preparing punch cards for tabulation; Woman on machine in BG.
Scale Model of Computer Room
Scale Model of Computer Room - Archival film documenting the early collaboration of computers & business technologies. MS three Caucasian male business executives standing behind detailed scale model of computer room, man in center points at the model while talking, the model details IBM data processing machines & mainframe storage towers.
Italy Looks Forward To Spring
The Forum of ancient Rome is as ageless as a beautiful woman (?). What better background for a showing of Italian fashions for Easter and beyond. In the race for milady's attention between Paris and Rome --- it seems to be a dead heat again this year. Women model evening wear amidst the ruins of ancient Rome. Rome, Italy The Forum of ancient Rome. MS - Model comes out wearing a two piece suit with a white blouse under the jacket, from black and white it turns into a all white outfit. MS - The next model is wearing a flared coat with a few bold stripes, she opens the jacket and exposes a very tailored white dress, black gloves and a picture frame hat. MS - A youthful cocktail dress, full skirt, on the bottom of the skirt is black feathers, over the elbow black gloves and a bee hive hair do with a ribbon tied around it and finished off with a bow. MS - The most dramatic fashion of all is a caped affair, she can wear it on her head like a veil, she lets the veil fall over the dress part off her head. The bodice of the dress is striped with velvet and golden thread. These fashions can stand against fashion of today.
Flying Half-Pint:One-Man Copter Packs Big Punch
A 12-foot crate is all that is needed to transport this tiny helicopter to the scene of action. At Elgin Air Force Base in Florida, the DO-32 is readied for flight within five minutes and the shipping crate acts as the launching pad. Easily maneuverable, the half-pint can land on a dime--- and have change left for gas. Florida Man is opening a 12 foot crate, there's a tiny helicopter inside the crate. MSOH - A small crowd gathers to whiteness the flight of the small copter. MS - Two military men setting up the Half-Pint Copter. MS - The pilot of the craft is patiently watching the military assemble the craft. MCUS - The pilot gets in and gets himself situated in the pilots seat. MS - The Half Pint Chopper takes off in a flash of a eye, straight up. MS - After some very impressive maneuvers the pilot lands the chopper on a very small launching pad.