Advanced Search
Raptors - Bald Eagle
TAPE 1 02:35:01 Bald Eagle, CU of bill and eye
Raptors - Saw Whet Owl
TAPE 1 02:37:14 Saw Whet Owl perched, CU
Raptors - Great Horned Owl
TAPE 1 02:40:00 Great Horned Owl perched, CU 02:43:03 This owl with gray squirrel 02:43:28 Owl with mouse
Raptors - Red Tailed Hawk
TAPE 1 02:45:15 Red-Tailed Hawk perched, CU 02:48:55 Hawk with twig for nest building 02:49:03 Hawk with wings spread
Raptors - Barred Owl
TAPE 1 02:50:02 Barred Owl in tree hollow, CU 02:50:59 CU of owl in tree hollow calling
Raptors - Burrowing Owl
TAPE 1 02:57:07 Burrowing Owl sits on prairie dog mound 02:53:36 Owl sits half way in mound 02:54:05 Owl sits on mound 02:54:42 Owl sits three quarters of the way in mound 02:55:18 Owl sits three quarters of the way in mound
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 26, 1974 (2/2)
[01.03.47] [in to Paul DUKE in studio] DUKE announces that Rep. SARBANES will defend his compromise amendment to the ARTICLE OF IMPEACHMENT charging OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE in debate. [promos for other PBS programming] [01.07.15--title screen--DUKE in studio] [01.07.34--cut committee room, wide view of bench] The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Maryland is recognized. Mr. SARBANES. Mr. Chairman, I -would like to take a moment or to speak on the substitute. It, of course sets out a substitute for Article I of the resolution of impeachment. think perhaps the thing that I could do that might be most the members of the committee is try to review very quickly the changes encompassed in this substitute as compared with article I as introduced on Wednesday evening.. I appreciate the fact members of the committee have reviewed carefully article I on Wednesday evening and in fact this substitute is in response to that careful examination of article I which has taken place. It is an effort to clarify language, clear up concepts, and this matter in a position where the debate can go more to the substance and less to the form of the article as it is before the committee. If the, members -will follow the original article and will follow the Substitute, there is very little, change in Paragraph 1 other than to clarify the language, The President of the United States." We are using throughout "Committee for the Re-election of the President" which is of course, its proper name and such changes in official references are also made with respect to the Department of Justice. There is stricken in paragraph 2 the phrase "has made it his continuing policy to act" and alternative language inserted so that at the sentence reads, "Subsequent thereto, Richard M. Nixon, using the powers of his high office, Made it his policy, and in furtherance of such policy did act directly and personally and through his close subordinates and agents" et cetera. The language near the bottom of paragraph 2 is amended to read, "to cover up, conceal, and protect those responsible;" There is stricken in paragraph 3 the language "or others" which previously followed the word "following." The means that are set out are illustrative of the policy that is contained in paragraph 2 which is basically the gravamen of this article and it was felt that the use of that language, "or others" was unnecessary and really superfluous. The first subparagraph listed follows essentially the previous language although limited to the investigative officers and employees of the United States. Subparagraph 2 of the substitute was subparagraph 6 of the original article; It, has been placed here in all effort to group together means which seems to be related to one another and it seemed appropriate that it should be listed here with I and rather than further down on the list. This is an effort, obviously, amongst other things. to introduce some additional logic into the structure of this article. Subparagraph 3 is essentially the same as subparagraph 2 of the original proposed article. In subparagraph 4 the language. "or endeavoring to interfere" has been added to the original provision "interfering with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, th Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force." Two changes clarifying the official titles of those agencies are also made. Subparagraph 5 strikes the language, "and concealing the payment of money" and substitutes "condoning and aquiescing in the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money." And then this subparagraph which previously went on to read: "for the purpose of obtaining the silence of participants in the illegal entry into the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee and other illegal activities" has been amended 'to read "for the purpose of obtaining the silence, or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses, or individuals who participated Such illegal entry and other illegal activities. In other words, the scope of that subparagraph encompasses individuals who participated in the influencing of the testimony of witnesses or potential witnesses. Subparagraph 6 of the substitute is identical with subparagraph 5 of the original article with the addition of the words "an agency of the United States" at the end of the sentence. Subparagraph 7 of the, substitute makes some changes in what was formerly subparagraph 8 of the original article. After the language, "disseminating information received from officers of the, Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations" has been added the following new language: "conducted by lawfully"---- The CHAIRMAN. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. DENNIS. Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent the gentleman be given 2 additional minutes [01.14.12]
US Navy Skyhawk Jets
U.S. Navy "Skyhawk" jets blasts river boats and bridges over North Vietnam. They operate from the carrier "Kittyhawk" to destroy vital links used by the Vietcong to transport men and supplies. POV - Aerial from a Navy Skyhawk jet flying over North Vietnam. Bombs going off in the distance that were dropped from the Navy jet the Skyhawk. POV - Rockets fired from the Skyhawk destroying North Vietnam targets, bridges and river traffic.
Anti-Shah Of Iran Riots
Two thousand anti-Shah demonstrators clash with police outside the Berlin Opera House. The students denounce the Shah of Iran as a "murderer". One killed, 44 injured during the violence. Exterior shot - Protestors holding up signs, some protestors have paper bags covering their heads, faces drawn on the bags - likeness of the Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Men removing the police barriers. Low Angle shot - A German police on horse back controlling the protestors. CU - German police officers standing arm in arm restraining the mob, men and women pushing and shoving against the police. High Angle shot - The crowd clashing with the police. MS - Police hitting one of the protestors with their knight sticks. Rear shot - Police hitting one man in the crowd with their night sticks and shoving, pushing and hitting others.
Dental Training
In Japan, schoolchildren observe annual "Dental Health Week" with mass demonstrations of proper brushing and care of teeth. 12,000 kids gather in Tokyo to massage their molars, en masse. Establishing shot - School children gather in a sports stadium to get proper instruction in 'Dental Hygiene.' CU - A dentist giving a demonstration on brushing using a huge model of teeth and a giant tooth-brush. CU - School age boy holding a tooth brush emulating the motion of brushing his teeth. CU - School age little girl emulating the motion of brushing her teeth. MS - Instructors using models of teeth and tooth brushes demonstrating the proper way to brush one's teeth. MS - Children (boys) going through the motions of brushing their teeth.
Cassius Clay Meets Athletes
Former champ Cassius Clay (Muhammad Ali) meets with nine top Negro athletes but remains firm on his anti-Army stand. Jim Brown says Clay's attitude is sincere, based wholly on his Black Muslim religion (Nation of Islam). Rear shot of a crowd, mostly men. MS - A very young and healthy Cassius Clay (Muhammad Ali) surrounded by other young athletes. CU - Bill Russell. CU - Jim Brown. CU - Cassius Clay (Muhammad Ali). MS - Cassius Clay and the other nine pro athletes.
Dutch Grand Prix
Jim Clark, Scotland, wins the Dutch Grand Prix, registering the fastest one-lap time of the race. Graham Hill, Jackie Stewart, and John Surtees all go out with engine trouble. Opening shot - Racing official waves the checker flag and the racing cars take off. MS - Man wearing sun glasses and a suit watching the cars fly by. High Angle shot - Race cars coming around the bend. Rear shot - Race cars going around the bend. MS - No 6 Graham Hill of England. CU Profile and Rear shot - Jackie Stewart has engine trouble, he's out of the race. CU - Race car driver (?). MS - No 5, Jim Clark of Scotland. MS - Racing official waving the checker flag. MS - Jim Clark No 5 with a wreath of flowers around his neck and a big smile on his face.
Cease-Fire: Uneasy Truce In Mid-East
Israel's smashing victory in a six day war with the UAR, Jordan, and Syria reverberates at the U.N. Angry debate keeps the Security Council in almost constant session, while Russia, Syria and other Arab and Iron Curtain delegates lash Israel and the United States, insisting on a return to original boundaries in the Middle East. Israeli Premiere Eschol flatly states Israel will determine her future. Ambassadors and delegates gather at the UN Security Council. High Angle shot ambassadors, U Thant. MCU Syrian Ambassador, George Toma. High Angle shot UN Ambassadors and Delegates. CU Russian Delegate, Nikolai Fedorenko. MCU Israel Ambassador, Gideon Rafael.
Ameila Earhart's Duplicated
30 year old Michigan schoolteacher, Mrs. Ann Pellegrino, takes off from Oakland to duplicate Amelia Earhart's flight of 1937. She'll take along a co-pilot, navigator, and mechanic on the 28 thousand mile, five-week flight to try and solve Miss Earhart's disappearance. Establishing shot - A 30 year old air plane sitting on the tarmac in front of "Guest Aircraft" ( Twin-engine Lockheed Electra). CU - Aviatrix Ann Pellegrino,, will trace Amelia Earhart's flight plan of 1937. CU - Ann Pellegrino,, the navigator and co-pilot. Rear shot - Of the twin engine Lockheed Electra. MS - Ann Pellegrino, getting into the plane. MS - Photographers at work. MS - Twin engine Lockheed Electra taking off.
Floyd Patterson vs Jerry Quarry, Heavyweights
32 year old Floyd Patterson, formerly Heavyweight Champ, gains a draw on his long comeback trail. Jerry Quarry, L.A. boy, gives Floyd a rough time, with two knockdowns in the second round. Quarry goes down once in the seventh and the fight ends as a slugging match. Opening shot - Floyd Patterson and Jerry Quarry boxing in the ring, Jerry Quarry is the lighter trunks. High Angle shot - Boxing spectators mostly men. MS - Jerry Quarry hits Floyd Patterson with a right-cross and Patterson hits the mat. VO say's this is the second knock down for Floyd in this round. Profile shot - Sport spectators. MS - It looks like Jerry Quarry is getting the best of Floyd who is 10-years older than Quarry. CU - Floyd swings and connects and Quarry hit's the mat. MS - The two fighters go toe to toe for a rousing finish, they are definitely throwing some punches, giving the fight spectators a good show. The 10-rounder comes to a close and the fight is declared a draw.
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 26, 1974 (1/2)
[00.02.00] [in Rep. SANDMAN debating Rep. SARBANES about the specificity of his proposed ARTICLE OF IMPEACHMENT. Mr. SARBANES. I believe that this article that is presented to you meets the law of impeachment with respect to the problem that you raise. Mr. SANDMAN. I did not ask that. I asked do you understand the law to say that an article of impeachment must be specific? Mr. SARBANES. In the same sense that a criminal indictment must be specific? I do not believe that the standards which govern the specificity of a criminal indictment are applicable to an article of impeachment if that is the thrust of the gentleman's question. Mr. SANDMAN. Well, now, do you not believe that under the duo process clause of the Constitution that every individual, including the President is entitled to due notice of what he is charged for? Do you believe that? Mr. SARBANES. I think this article does provide due notice. Mr. SANDMAN. You are not answering my question. Mr. SARBANES. Well, I think, lam answering your question. Mr. SANDMAN. Well, let me ask you this, then. As I see this, you have about 20 different charges here, all on one piece of paper, and not one of them specific. The gentleman from California has asked you for a date, for example, on charge 1 and 2, no date. You say that he, withheld relevant material. When and how? Is he not entitled to know that? How does be answer such a charge? This is not due process. Due process---- Mr. SARBANES. I would point, out to the gentleman from New Jersey that the President's counsel entered this committee room at the very moment that members of this committee entered the, room and began to receive the presentation of information, and that he stayed in this room---- Mr. SANDMAN. I do not yield any further. Mr. SARBANES[continuing]. Throughout that process. Mr. SANDMAN. I do not yield any further for those kinds of speeches. I want answers and this is what I am entitled to. This- is a charge against the President of the United States, why he should be tried to be thrown out of office, and that is what it is for. For him to be duly noticed of what you are charging him, in my judgment, he is entitled to know specifically what he did wrong, and how does he gather that from what you say here? Mr. SARBANES. My response to the gentleman is that the article sets out the means. The President's counsel has been here throughout the proceedings and is aware of the material that was presented to us, and at this article, in comparison---- Mr. SANDMAN. One last question. One last question, and you Can answer. Do You or do you not believe, and you can say yes or no,, that the the President is entitled to know in the articles of impeachment specifically on what day he did that thing for which you say he should be removed from office? Is he entitled to know that, and in an article of impeachment, not by virtue of the fact that his counsel was here? Mr. DANIELSON. Mr. Chairman? Mr. SEIBERLING. Mr. Chairman? Mr. SARBANES. I do not believe that the article of impeachment is going to contain all the specific facts which go to support the article. If it were to do that, the article of impeachment would be 18 volumes. Or whatever the number of volumes are, Pertinent to place into it all of the specific information. Mr. SANDMAN. I do not think it has to say that at all. But, I think It has to say that on a certain day he did something which is illegal. thus-and-so You can say that in a simple sentence, but you are not saying that here. And, in fact, there is plenty of law on this point. and it says that those things shall not be general, these things shall not be general. They shall be specific. This has been the case of every impeachment trial tried in the United States, all the way up to the last one in 1936. You do not dispute that. do you? Mr. SARBANES. I do dispute that. If the gentleman is talking or referring back to criminal indictments. then the thrust of the gentleman's point has some merit. but I do dispute it when he shifts it to the law of impeachment. It is not a correct statement of the law of impeachment, Mr. SANDMAN. I am talking about the impeachment of Justice Ritter. That was an impeachment. Mr. DONOHUE. The time of the gentleman from New Jersey has expired. Mr. DENNIS. Mr. Chairman ? Mr. DONOHUE. The Chairman recognizes the gentleman from California Mr. Danielson. [00.06.28]
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 26, 1974 (1/2)
[00.12.21--Recess declared] [DUKE voiceover says that members had a "working lunch" behind closed doors to work out the impasse, with a further compromise, with DEMOCRATS offering some specifics] The CHAIRMAN. The committee will come to order. Mr. BROOKS. Mr. Chairman? The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Texas, Mr. Brooks. Mr. BROOKS. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank you for recognizing me and yield my 5 minutes to the gentleman from Maryland, Mr. Sarbanes. The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Maryland. Mr. SARBANES./ I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Chairman, there are two points I want to clarify stemming out of the discussion that was held this morning. The first deals with the procedural aspects of this matter with respect to the detailing of the factual material that underlies the article of impeachment. And there I want to make three things very clear. First, the President's counsel has been here throughout the proceedings All of the factual material that the committee has considered, all of the statements of information, all of the summaries were provided to him on a daily basis just as they -were provided to us. So the Contours and the details and the pattern and the interrelationship of the factual matters have been spelled out fully to the President's counsel. Nothing has been concealed from him. Second, this committee once it makes its decision, will have to make a recommendation to the floor of the House of Representatives and at that point what -we bring forth will be supported by a report which will have to detail the underpinning for the action that we have taken. So the material -will again be spelled out there for the benefit Of our Colleagues in the House before they make their decision. Neither at this' point, nor in the House, is the President yet on trial. He is only on trial when the matter reaches ]the Senate. And third, when the matter does reach the Senate the President's counsel is in a position to seek further specification if he deems it necessary, although it is my conviction that his participation here and the further report that will have to be prepared for the Members of the House of Representatives will fully provide him with all of the material necessary to prepare a defense for the trial which will take place in the other body. Now, that is the procedural side of this thing. Let me turn for a moment to some of the substantive things. Time, of course, is not, going to permit me to sketch out all of these matters which underlie the, allegations in this article. But I do to set some of them out so there is some appreciation of the detail that lies behind the charge that is being made against the President the, United States and contained in this article I for the purposes OF, impeachment. Let us look- at the pattern of conduct that began subsequent- to the break-in on June 17. The President professed ignorance of both the involvement of the Committee to Re-Elect the President and White House Involvement in Watergate in the face of discussions of Watergate on or before June 20, with Haldeman, Colson, and Mitchell, persons aware, of such involvement and the President's closest advisors. On the morning of June 20, Haldeman Mitchell Ehrlichman, Kleindienst and Dean met in the, White House in the early morning. Later that morning Haldeman met -with the President. The Chief of Staff met with the President. And his notes indicate that in that conversation with the, President Watergate was discussed. The part of the tape pertaining to the Watergate discussion is the 18 1/2 minutes that are missing and which an expert panel reported to Judge Sirica were manually erased. The President has refused to honor subpenas of this committee seeking conversations with Haldeman and Colson on June 20, On the 22d of June the President made a statement that Mitchell and Ziegler stated the facts accurately -when they said there was no basis for believing involvement. on the 23d of June the President had a meeting with Haldeman, his chief of staff, subsequent to which Haldeman and Ehrlichman met with Helms and Walters and in effect, directed them to indicate to the FBI that the pursuance of the investigation into Mexico should halted because it might encounter CIA activities . The day before, on the 22d of June, Helms had told Gray, the FBI Director, that there -was no CIA involvement and at the June 23 meeting, at that meeting initially Helms and Walters reported to Haldeman and Ehrlichman that there was no such involvement. On the 30th--on the 20th of June, Mitchell apologized to the President because some of his people had gotten out of hand. He regretted that he had not policed the people in his organization. We heard that tape. on the 30th of June there was a conversation with Mitchell in when the, president indicated that they must cut the loss from potential disclosures about CRP involvement in Watergate by having Mitchell resign as campaign director. On the 6th of July. in a conversation with the President., the Director of the FBI Patrick Gray, told the President the Members of 'his staff ware trying to mortally wound him. The President paused for a long time and then said to Pat Gray, you just keep on with your aggressive and thorough investigation. He did not ask Pat Gray then or later what he meant by that, who was involved, who was trying to do it, how they were trying to do it, On August 29th the President issued a statement concerning the. Dean report. He, went before the, American people and said he had asked John Dean to invest investigate gate the matter. The CHAIRMAN. The time of the gentleman has expired. [00.18.42]
Liberace Show #43, Master 404
Selections: THE IRVING BERLIN SHOW "It's A Lovely Day Today" with vocal LIBERACE TELLS THE IRVING BERLIN STORY "Easter Parade" "You're Just In Love" with vocal (FEATURES SPLIT SCREEN, TWO LIBERACES) "Always" "Prelude in C Sharp Minor" (Rachmaninoff) "Alexander's Ragtime Band" with vocal
Liberace Show #44, Master 408
Selections: "Hi, Neighbor" with vocal "Malaguena" with dancer "Canadian Capers" "The Nearness of You" with vocal LIBERACE INTRODUCES GEORGE AND ORCHESTRA "May the Good Lord Bless You and Keep You" (LIBERACE RECITES THE LYRICS)
Liberace Show #45, Master 407
Selections: "When the Red-Red Robin Comes Bobbin' Along" with vocal "Stormy Weather" "Over the Rainbow" with vocal but without the piano "Forest Murmurs" (Liszt) "Falling Leaves" "Sleigh Ride"
Liberace Show #46, Master 406
Selections: "Bye Bye Blues" "Happy Birthday Medley" "Adios" "Anniversary Song" with vocal "Musical Rosary" "Don't Ever Marry For Money" with vocal
Liberace Show #47, Master 409
Selections: "Shade of the Old Apple Tree" "Wild Rose" (McDowell) "Lying n the Hay" with vocal but without piano "Comin' Around the Mountain" "Dream of Olwen" "Hey, Liberace" with vocal (A COMEDY SONG THAT FEATURES LIBERACE IN A HILLBILLY COSTUME)
Liberace Show #48, Master 411
Selections: MEXICAN SHOW "Mexican Hat Dance" "Little Star" "Uma Picito de Amore" "Via Con Dios" with vocal but without piano "Virgin of the Arena" "Somebody Bad Stole the Wedding Bell" with vocal
Liberace Show #49, Master 410
Selections: MIAMI SHOW "Sun in the Morning and the Moon at Night" with vocal "Orchards in the Moonlight" "Moon Over Miami" with vocal "Miami Beach Rhumba" "Clair de Lune" (Debussy) "Tropicana"